Supervolcano :: essays research papers

Supervolcano1. Docudramas like Supervolcano are valuable in the sense that they provide certain elements to the viewer that cannot be comprise in dramas or documentaries. For the drama enthusiast, it sparks an interest by presenting characters and a climactic plot to speed the informational aspect of the movie along. For the documentary enthusiast, it includes a plot ground on factual information, and provides something to be learned. Supervolcano was a true docudrama, and appealed to a wider variety of people. Although its plot was fictitious, the information about Yellowstones volcanic potential, however far-fetched, was interest and urged the viewer to wonder about the future of Yellowstone. 2. The ratio of drama to documentary in Supervolcano was probably 8020. Although there was factual evidence presented in the film, it seems as though it was manipulated to fit the plotline, and did not actually coincide with any scientific theory. It could easily be construed that the norm al fluctuations at Yellowstone are indicators of looming volcanic activity, but those fluctuations buzz off also happened throughout history without consequences. The film, however, noted this fact and stated through the characters that the prediction of a volcanic event is never concrete or dependable. I feel the producers of this film created a successful docudrama in that they were able to present scientific information in a dramatic sense do the film more widely acceptable. 3. The information given to the viewer on the evidence of the coming volcanic activity seemed to be pretty accurately base on the knowledge of volcanoes presented in this course. The evidence included an increase in seismic activity/ earthquakes caldera swelling and irregular growth bulges above the caldera vegetation finis and the release of toxic gases such as sulfur dioxide. These symptoms have been present on and around volcanoes that have erupted in the past, and are considered indicative of volcanic activity.-Hazards inhaling volcanic rock dust/ash (essentially makes cement in the lungs) volcanic rock dust/ash accumulating on architecture (becomes twice as dense when coalesce with rain) pyroclastic flow volcanic gases and dust getting into the atmosphere 4. Consider the specific scenes where seismic activity occurs, and when the scientists discuss the size and location of those earthquakes. Are those scenes realistic? wherefore/why not? -It seems realistic enough. For example, the readings of the seismograph. However, the stuff with the hologram projection computer program seemed like something from Star Wars.